If the campground is full, we just pull some stunt like that, and we get transported to a nice warm jail cell somewhere in Michigan.

Maybe I'll bring along a tag torn from a mattress.
Moderator: MikeT
I would be surprised if you came across, as you put it, a pedantic ranger. Most of the rangers and staff that I have come across on IR have been professional in their manner and performence of their duties. I know of an instance where a sailboat at Birch Isle had pitched a tent outside of the shelter and were told by a ranger to take it down. I am not aware of any instances when either a person or in some cases a group such as the case when a group of young backpackers, after drinking too much decided to sleep on the America's dock or the group that decided to "move in" to the shelters at Grace Island a few years ago were treated unfairly. People come to IR for the most part to get away.DonNewcomb wrote:I guess we won't know until someone runs into a very pedantic ranger and an equally pedantic Federal Magistrate.Keweenaw wrote: Correct - this reg is about limiting the footprint of use and also not using the shelter as a storage facility.
I'm probably a little sensitive about this because we did, just that. Every ranger but one was easy-breezy about our plan to camp XC. No problem, it's on the permit, have a nice time, don't start any fires. The last one, after the fact, wanted to read us the riot act only because the dates didn't line up exactly. This after several rangers told us that it didn't matter. So, it seems that there are cases where some rangers can seem to be much more picky than other rangers. When it involves a bunch saying, "No problem", and one saying, "Oh, we have a big problem here." it can seem quite pedantic.johnhens wrote: I would be surprised if you came across, as you put it, a pedantic ranger. Most of the rangers and staff that I have come across on IR have been professional in their manner and performence of their duties.
I have included X-country permits in my visits and have been told that I must stay within the area I requested on the given day/date I requested. This was from the ranger in Houghton who has been with the NPS for a while. I was told part of the reason was that wolf packs in Spring/Summer would be having pups and they wanted to keep off trail hikers away from sensitive denning areas. I would also suspect that if you turned up missing, searching for you would be easier if you have stayed within your requested areas on your permit as often is the case on IR with those not familiar with it, off trail hiking can be very difficult, the topo maps do not show wet areas and dense downed timber that make x-country travel difficult.DonNewcomb wrote:I'm probably a little sensitive about this because we did, just that. Every ranger but one was easy-breezy about our plan to camp XC. No problem, it's on the permit, have a nice time, don't start any fires. The last one, after the fact, wanted to read us the riot act only because the dates didn't line up exactly. This after several rangers told us that it didn't matter. So, it seems that there are cases where some rangers can seem to be much more picky than other rangers. When it involves a bunch saying, "No problem", and one saying, "Oh, we have a big problem here." it can seem quite pedantic.johnhens wrote: I would be surprised if you came across, as you put it, a pedantic ranger. Most of the rangers and staff that I have come across on IR have been professional in their manner and performence of their duties.
It would have been nice if any of the several rangers we discussed our plans with in advance had mentioned this.johnhens wrote: I have included X-country permits in my visits and have been told that I must stay within the area I requested on the given day/date I requested. This was from the ranger in Houghton who has been with the NPS for a while. I was told part of the reason was that wolf packs in Spring/Summer would be having pups and they wanted to keep off trail hikers away from sensitive denning areas. I would also suspect that if you turned up missing, searching for you would be easier if you have stayed within your requested areas on your permit as often is the case on IR with those not familiar with it, off trail hiking can be very difficult, the topo maps do not show wet areas and dense downed timber that make x-country travel difficult.
That's an interesting question. Frankly, ISRO was my brother's goal. I would have been happy going to the Smokies, which would have been much closer, less expensive and less complicated. I think I might be giving a more enthusiastic response had we seen the Northern Lights or any mammal bigger than a squirrel. What I enjoyed most was the isolation. In most wilderness areas in the East you may still hear traffic or trains in the distance, or see the lights of a distant city. On ISRO, particularly in the interior, you will only see the occasional contrail of a high-flying jet.Given this was your first trip to IR, what was your general impression of IR, was it what you thought it would be?
So far, there have been no serious discussions of a return trip. Some talk about, "Maybe, if we come again, we'll...." Like many trails in the East, ISRO tends to be just a long walk through a green tunnel. Our discussions often came back to how the NPS should have put more trails along the shore.johnhens wrote: Since it was your brothers idea, what did he think and will you come back?
That's the way some of our discussion has been leaning.Keweenaw wrote:Hey Don,
....
or canoe or kayak