wilderness stewardship plan overview

Questions on general information and things that do not fit into any other categories.

Moderator: srparr

Post Reply
kkrause
NewbieCake
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri May 31, 2024 11:51 am
Been thanked: 3 times

wilderness stewardship plan overview

Post by kkrause »

I just ran into the the finalized Wilderness stewardship plan that was released in Aug 2024:

Plan A: The “no-action alternative” describes existing management practices as described in the 1998 GMP and
as implemented through the Superintendent’s Compendium. Under alternative A, the NPS would
continue to address the needs of wilderness stewardship in accordance with the GMP, which generally
addresses how the park conducts activities within wilderness.

Plan B: Alternative B focuses on enhancing wilderness character with specific emphasis on improving the
visitors’ wilderness experience and providing for additional access opportunities consistent with the
public purposes of wilderness

Plan C: Alternative C would emphasize solitude by decreasing day use group size, reducing the number of
campsites within campgrounds, eliminating some trails, implementing a camping reservation system, and
allowing winter access to the park.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BPRLpG ... sp=sharing

You can download the entire 144 page document here
https://parkplanning.nps.gov/document.c ... tID=138446
backwoods doc
Bushwacker
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 6:38 pm
Isle Royale Visits: 6
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: wilderness stewardship plan overview

Post by backwoods doc »

Interesting that they now label Alternative B (the plan that includes reserving backcountry sites in advance) as the preferred alternative.
2018, 2019, 2021 (all inland lakes by canoe); 2022 X2 (RH and WC); 2023 HC
User avatar
Ingo
Forum Moderator
Posts: 1976
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 2:11 pm
Isle Royale Visits: 15
Location: Hillsborough, NC
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: wilderness stewardship plan overview

Post by Ingo »

backwoods doc wrote: Thu Sep 19, 2024 8:36 pm Interesting that they now label Alternative B (the plan that includes reserving backcountry sites in advance) as the preferred alternative.
Alternative B: "A new permitting system and monitoring program would be established with visitors required to obtain backcountry/wilderness permits in advance. Wilderness campgrounds would be booked up to 85% of capacity. The remaining 15% of campsites would not be booked in advance to allow for flexible itineraries and to address overcrowding and conflicts in campgrounds."
So there would/will still be itinerary flexibility, but you would need to permit in advance of your trip and could not list intended campgrounds that are 85% booked. Individual sites would not be reserved.

Alternative C: would mean "... implementing a camping reservation system ...", literally recreation.gov.
24: MI-MB-MI, 22: BI-PC-BI-RH, 21: RH-ML-DF-MB-DF, 18: MC-PC-BI-DB-RH-DF, 17: WI-IM-SB-FL-WC, 16: RH-TM-CI-TI-RH, 14: BI-ML-CI-CH-MB, 13: RH-PI, 12: MC-CB-HL-TH, 11: WC-HC-WC, 09: MC-BI-DN-RH, 05: MI-CI-MB-DF-RH-TM-RH, 02: MC-LR-WL-CH, 01: BI-DB-RH, 79: worked RH
kkrause
NewbieCake
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri May 31, 2024 11:51 am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: wilderness stewardship plan overview

Post by kkrause »

Alternative C: would mean "... implementing a camping reservation system ...", literally recreation.gov.
yes, I read somewhere in the full document that receation.gov would be used.

I was a bit on the edge about the reservation system at first, but then I remembered I plan all my trips nearly a year in advance so I would directly benefit from this.

2 of the plans would eliminate the section of the Indian portage trail between the lake Richie trail and the lake Richie portage, meaning Chippewa harbor would become another water access site only :shock:
User avatar
IncaRoads
Forum Moderator
Posts: 351
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 1:52 pm
Isle Royale Visits: 14
Location: St. Paul, MN / Fernandina Beach, FL
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: wilderness stewardship plan overview

Post by IncaRoads »

kkrause wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 6:31 am 2 of the plans would eliminate the section of the Indian portage trail between the lake Richie trail and the lake Richie portage, meaning Chippewa harbor would become another water access site only :shock:
I sure hope they don't eliminate that short section of the Indian Portage Trail. About 50% of the time I disembark the island at Chippewa Harbor via the Voyageur II.
Post Reply